After reading Daniel Pink’s chapter on empathy, I explored Simon Baron-Cohen’s research on empathizing versus systemizing. I was unfamiliar with his research and found the concept that gender plays a major role in empathy intriguing. I learned that empathizing includes being able to recognize another person’s feelings and personally feel them. A good empathizer is able to read whether or not someone is lying, faking a smile or internally perplexed. Then he/she attaches themselves to the other’s feelings. On the other hand, I learned that systemizing people are detached, absorbed in details and structured by rules. After understanding what these terms meant, I was not shocked to find out that Simon Baron-Cohen’s research concluded that women are naturally better empathizers and men are better at systemizing. I decided to take the Simon Baron-Cohen’s empathizing/systemizing test to see what my scores would.
I scored a 60 on the empathy test. The questions I was asked centered around my ability to read other people’s feelings without them directly stating or showing them. I believe my score is fairly accurate to my personality. I have a more nurturing attitude for the people I am close to in my life. I attribute this to my natural instincts as a woman to protect my family. For the most part, I am very good at intuitively knowing the people I am close with feelings. However, I have trouble empathizing with people I do not know well. This explains why I received a middle range score on my empathy test.
While I am a relatively good empathizer, my strong suite is in systemizing. I love lists, rubrics, organizing, excel spreadsheets, charts, detailed plans, and understanding how things happen and why they work. Essentially, I am a very Left-brained thinker. I dwell on the analytical and become freaked out if rules are not followed. I believe this is why I received an 81 on my systemizing test. I grew up analyzing details with my dad and constantly asking why things work. I would somewhat detached myself from objects and/or scenarios in order to dissect them and rationalize conclusions. Unfortunately, this is not a very good tactic in sympathizing with other people’s feelings.
I believe my ability to adequately empathize with others balances my systemizing brain. While I tend to fixate on details and rationalizations, I still am able to recognize other’s emotions and appropriately react. The Myers-Brigg survey I discussed in my last blog post said that I am a 1% thinker. This simply means that I am slightly more rational than emotional with my decision making. My results from the Simon Baron-Cohen’s test nicely complements these results. However, I do go against the gender norms predicted by Simon Baron-Cohen. Generally females have a higher score on empathizing than systemizing. I attribute my inverted scores to the fact that I grew up in a very rational family. I learned to analyze situations instead of just going by my emotions. All in all, doing these tests has shown me that I am a pretty balanced individual when it comes to thinking.
Photo Credit: Kelsea Shriver