Testing My Empathy

I decided to test myself to see how good I am at finding “fake smiles” with the BBC test. 14 out of 20 correctly spotted. Not bad, but it still shows the difficulties people have in detecting fake smiles. Out of the six smiles I was unable to correctly identify, three of them were actually genuine while three of them were fake. So its not as if I’m more confused by fakes than by genuine smiles, it seems I am equally confused by both types.

The next test I took was the “Mind in the Eyes Test”, which showed different pictures of peoples eyes (and just their eyes) and asked me to choose between four choices of the possible mood the person was in. Out of thirty six questions, I got twenty eight correct. With an average range from twenty two to thirty, I feel as if I am able to judge emotions only from the eyes well enough, however I am not out of the ordinary in this. This seems like an odd test for empathy as looking at ones eyes and recognizing what they are feeling seems easier for someone who is more observant rather than just more empathetic.

One final test to round out the group was the “Empathy Quotient”. After answering several questions, I was given a score from 0 to 80. My score? 28. The normal score for any male? 42. Well, what am I to say to this? That I lack empathy? It’s entirely possible if empathy is being defined by sixty simple questions. It’s entirely possible that I am not empathetical in the same ways as people. It’s difficult to say though, as this is the only “empathy” test I have ever taken in my life. It does not seem very promising sadly.


Saying thanks

The words “thank you” are not very oft used, especially coming from India. There have been many times that I have held doors open for complete stranger (something that is common in the US) and do not even get acknowledgement for that action. At the other end of the spectrum, many times when having food delivered, I would thank the person delivering my food and they would be surprised that I had uttered those words.

I sat down and thought about the things I’m thankful about and how many times I have actually said “thank you” for. I decided that the two people I had not said thank you to were my parents and decided to call them up and do exactly what I had not done: thank them. While I must admit my mother is not the most stoic of people, she was overjoyed at the phone call and it really did prove the theory that Mr. Seligman has.


The Big Three (or four…or five…) of ChemE

Chemical Engineering is such a broad field of study that it is difficult to pin point specific people who change the ENTIRE field. Therefore, I thought it better to showcase people who have or are changing a specific part of the field (of course these parts are very important to the rest of the field).

One man, named Csaba Horvath (no I cannot pronounce this name), has changed the way the entire chemical industry looks at separating chemicals. Called “high performance liquid chromatography”, this technique allowed for separation of biological compounds that could not be vaporized. Another technique he developed (along with two others) was called “reversed phase liquid chromatography”, and described the different mechanisms for retention.

Csava Horvath

Another quite prestigious name in Chemical Engineering (and especially particle sampling) is Pierre Gy. A Paris born chemical engineering major from ESPCI ParisTech, he focused most of his work on developing his own theory of “sampling” (selecting a sample of anything from a much larger population), creating a system to be able to model the outcome of the particle sampled. This has become one of the most widely used methods in many industries to run tests.

Pierre Gy's Book on Sampling Theory

Another very influential man, Lee Raymond, was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ExxonMobil from 1999 to 2005. He has a BS and PhD in chemical engineering and received the Woodrow Wilson Award from the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

Lee Raymond

These are only three of the many people in the chemical industry that have been able to “rock the boat” in terms of techniques, theories, and even for specific companies.

 

Bibliography:

Csava Horvath

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Csaba_Horváth_(chemical_engineer)

http://www.eng.yale.edu/images/horvath3.jpg

Pierre Gy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Gy

http://i43.tower.com/images/mm100028819/pierre-gys-sampling-theory-practice-heterogeneity-francis-f-pitard-hardcover-cover-art.jpg

Lee Raymond:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Raymond

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/06/then_now/image/bp261269.jpg


So in 20 years…

I have had a sort of lack of inspiration in my life. It has always been difficult to find people who I can honestly say I actually care about or want to emulate. However, the one person I respect more than anyone else in my life is my grandfather. Holding a BA, an MA, and a PhD in political science, having taught most of the Prime Ministers of India (think President for the Americans), and even having started one of the most prestigious political science universities in India, he is easily the most experienced man I have met. While I never had any sort of love for political science, I am interested in chemistry and physics in the same way my grandfather is in political science.

Considering my general lack of future planning, the only thing on my mind coming to Tech is to graduate having done well enough to make my grandfather proud of me. While completely cliche, I do want to graduate and start working and make money. I do not know what I want to do, but I do know that I want to be proud of what I have done and I wish to make my grandfather proud of me.

I realize that my view of life (not having a clue as to what I actually wish to do save “chemical engineering”) is not very productive, but that is all I have been able to figure out. That and “making money is the only way to have a happy life” (which has been drilled into my mind since I started going to school).

All in all, I wish to graduate Tech and accomplish two things by the end of my four or five (please no more) years here:

1) Make my grandfather proud of me

2) Get a good job and make money


GAMES

I love games. LOVE games. “Get Your Game On”? Pfft, you’re late my friend. I’ve been to gamespot.com so many times. I have an account, and I follow new and upcoming games even if I’ll never actually play them just to see what is coming out. Personally, I do not like the massively multiplayer online role playing games (MMORPG’s) due to their EXTREME time consuming nature (the effort put into these games is mind boggling really).  I do however love most other types of games (especially action/adventure/fantasy games). I would be surprised to find an eighteen year old male who does not. Very surprised.

It was fun to go back to Game Spot and read up on the new games coming out. I await these games just so I can read the review and just KNOW what there is in the world and how the gaming industry is doing and where they are going.

That’s all I have to say.

WAIT! No. One more thing. Fun games are fun. (That’s one meme for the world. Go me for knowing that).


Six Degrees of (Web) Separation?

I have actually tried the “six degrees of separation” experiment before! It was quite eye opening. From facebook, to Wikipedia it is possible to connect almost any topics or people together by enough random clicking. It’s quite entertaining really, we even made a game out of it. I have never tried this with websites though. I felt this just shows how much smaller of a world we live in now. This only underlines how close together the internet has brought the world. Not only are people connected, but so are ideas, and the more connected ideas we have the more progress we will make.

Nice to know we’re doing well so far.


Invention Mobs (Step 1): Our Idea

This time my group and I sat down and came up with a base for the project. A main idea of sorts. Since we have to incorporate Ze Frank’s model of using the input of complete strangers for a final product, we thought the best way to start would be to collect information from people.

By leaving out a simple whiteboard with a marker with something such as “Add a thought of the day” written on it, and coming back and taking a picture of it at the end of everyday, we can indirectly interact with many people and ask for their input. This will allow us to collect a lot of information, and since we can use multiple whiteboards we can create a social experiment of sorts.

I hope the idea works out. For the next few steps we need to flesh out the main goal and what we want to learn from the “strangers”.