Recently in class we discussed the topic of video games. Why are they so entertaining? Are they helpful or hurtful? Why, even when we know were wasting time, must we play games rather than do something productive? Personally, I think the idea of an alternate reality is what addicts people to games. The idea that you can be a professional soccer player, or army man or alien without actually going through the physical aspect of these characters is what makes people come back for more.
Anyway, tonight I read my section in Dan Pink’s A Whole New Mind and got his opinions on what makes gaming so addicting; the humor, the joy and sense of accomplishment, and just getting away from everyday life to play. All of these are valid points. Another topic brought up in class was the idea of right brain games or games geared towards serving a purpose in everyday life. (like FIFA doesn’t?) So when given the choice to pick one of Mr. Pink’s activities presented at the end of the section, I chose to research right brain games.
Jane McGonigal presents in her TEDtalk her ideas on video games in relation to the right brain. She believes that right brain games are to be taken seriously. She says that they can give meaning to playing a video game. I disagree.
After searching the net for different critiques of right-brain-geared video games, I found that they are not catching on simply because they are too realistic. They serve too much of a purpose. This relates to my opinion on video games: people play video games because they want to escape reality. You don’t use your Xbox to study. Who practices math problems on their Wii? Video games and productiveness do not translate.
Jane McGonigal argues for video games in her TEDtalk, saying that they can potentially increase productiveness. As much as I would love that, it is truly too good to be true. Who really wants to waste money and time on a video game that you could play written down on paper? Video games are supposed to be creative, and fun, not educational.